The road to acceptance for the theory of Darwin’s Evolution has been a rocky one. But today it is under attack more than ever before. These attacks are no longer just from the religious arena, they are coming from the scientific community, and from highly respected individuals. This web site postulates a new scientific theory, ‘Dynamic Evolution,’ the ideas of which are demonstrated to be superior to the precepts of Darwin’s theories
Note that this is a work of science, referencing the most up to date findings of contemporary scientists, and does not cover philosophical, religious, or speculative studies! This work has no affinity either with the beliefs of Creationists or the advocates of Intelligent Design.
Dynamic Evolution takes you from the world of the sub-atomic, via the basics of quantum mechanics and through the progressive stages of size and time to galactic superclusters; demonstrating at each stage a specific, confined set of laws and principles that provide a consistent mechanism for the gradual development of all the objects and forces in the universe. In contrast to the precepts of Darwinian Evolution, its principles will be seen as a “better fit” in terms of providing the answers to the origin of, not just “the species,” but of all that we see and discern around us.
Yes, something new is turning the heads of the scientific community…
[Click here for the UK copy.]
[After you have grasped at least the fundamental concepts of Dynamic Evolution, take a quick look at the anonymous poll at the bottom of this page and, if you feel inclined, please tick one of the boxes — no personal data is collected, the system only counts the clicks.]
Dynamic Evolution offers a comprehensive challenge to the Darwinian premise that the diversity of life is explained solely by the natural selection and survival of the fittest. It will become apparent from a complete study of this work that the principle of the selection of strong functions / properties of life and living organisms, whilst providing a partial fit and a compelling argument, falls under the shadow of the complete picture provided by Dynamic Evolution. Just as a large multi-piece mosaic can appear quite beautiful and coherent, even when some of the pieces do not quite make the right fit (they “look almost right”; the emergent patterns can still be impressive and instructive), the picture they present seems to lack something. A comparison with the more accurate paradigm, with the pieces in elegant continuity exhibiting contiguous patterns, becomes the preferred arrangement.
The above explanation is in good company. Einstein once wrote:
“I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details.”
Please note that this work does not attempt to explain the “who” “what” “when” “where” and “how” of Einstein’s “God.” Nor does this work have any affiliation with the proponents of “Intelligent Design” or the advocates of “Creationism.”